This article is written by a student writer from the Her Campus at Adelphi chapter.
Memes of varying intelligences constantly cycle throughout the internet. It is easy to
avoid or ignore the majority of them, but when I found hundreds of videos popping up on my
Facebook newsfeed near the end of the summer, I found ignoring them proved more difficult. The
content of the videos was even more troubling – idiots pouring freezing water on themselves. The
Ice Bucket Challenge was taking the web by storm. What had the internet come to?
Early issues were caused by the challenge not being properly explained. People did the
challenge without the knowledge that it was tied to ALS, or would not mention it in their videos.
Even once this important missing link was restored, skeptics (like myself) asked if the Ice Bucket
Challenge was really making a difference. Could pouring water on your head really raise money
and awareness?
Apparently, it could. The Ice Bucket Challenge has helped to raise millions of dollars
alstop41million.html?_r=1 ) for ALS. Even celebrities were breaking out both their buckets and
wallets. Now, no one can deny the amazing effect that the challenge has had. It is fantastic that all
of this money is going to charities in order to research further into the disease. However, it is
important to look back at the structure of the challenge and recognize some fundamental issues.
For one, the Ice Bucket Challenge only motivates people to donate; it does not educate
people about the disease itself. Understanding individuals’ struggles is just as important as taking
the time to help them. Most Ice Bucket Challenges also do not specify specific charities to send
donations. For this reason, most people looking to donate will just google ‘ALS Charity’ and
donate to the first one they see. It is important to note that there are some charities that still support
animal testing and stem cell research, both controversial topics that people may take personal issue
with. (source: http://www.alsa.org/aboutus/icebucketchallengefaq.html ) It is vital to research
into what you are donating to and for what your donation will be used.
Another issue with the Ice Bucket Challenge is that its impact is shortterm. The challenge
only asks for a onetime donation. You donate once you and you have done your part; your good
deed for the day. It is not geared towards the formation of behavioral changes to encourage further
donation. Once the popularity of the Ice Bucket Challenge goes down, you can bet that the
frequency of donations will also drop.
If behavioral changes were enforced, maybe people would be more encouraged to look
into other disabilities and charities as well. As the challenge stands, it only helps ALS. The
challenge has so much more potential to bring a variety of issues into the spotlight, many of which
are in desperate need for donations and affect even more people than ALS, such as Heart Disease.
As I said before, none of this cancels out the fact that the challenge has done a lot of good,
but we cannot ignore the bad. Our generation has to eliminate these hitandrun tactics that we are
so found of using, because they generally fall flat in the longterm picture. Any future movements
to raise awareness should focus on forming continuous donation behaviors. They should not just
raise awareness of the need to donate, but of the functions of the disability itself. This generation
can be so powerful when it comes together for movements such as the Ice Bucket Challenge, but if
we do not build stamina, we will not win the race.