Â
Itâs fair to say that ASOS holds a special place in every British girlâs heart. Whether youâre in a mad dash in need of next day delivery or after some major retail therapy, this trusty retailer has you covered.
However, the company has recently undergone major scrutiny for its latest release of Maybellineâs new âFit Meâ liquid foundations, on which the promotional photographs showcase a series of fair skinned foundations swatched on a black modelâs arm. This created quite the stir on social media, as people took to Twitter and Facebook accusing the retailer of objectifying the modelâs âblacknessâ and reducing her to a mere âpropâ to show off the products for white skin.
Source:ASOS
Ironically the âFit Meâ foundation boasts an extensive range of over 25 different shades and tones promising your âperfect foundation fitâ, yet the advertised âperfect matchâ is lost in the complete mismatch to the modelâs mahogany skin tone. Twitter user @peatreebojangles mocked the campaign commenting âhey! black ppl! u don’t need to wear this foundation, but we will use u as a measure of others lightness!â. Other users @BeLikeAudrey remarked that the photographs were ânot okay!â and @Varaidzo implored both ASOS and Maybelline to âdo betterâ.
Source: Twitter
Whereas Maybelline has recently denied all knowledge and connection to the advertisement of their product, ASOS has released a statement commenting they did not wish to âcause offenceâ although an official apology has not been announced. Many have also dubbed the social media backlash an âoverreactionâ, as @k2828 describes the retailerâs situation as âdamned if you do, damned if you donât!â and that âthere has to be a colour contrast to see the tonesâ.
The whole controversy appears quite reminiscent of last monthâs Urban Decay Razor Sharp scandal, that showcased a new range of Razor Sharp liquid eyeliners swatched on the underside of a modelâs wrist. Due to the violent nature of the product name and the precarious positioning of the swatches across the major arteries, Urban Decay have been accused of âglorifying self-harmâ and âusing the emotionality of self-mutilation as a topic to cause hype around the productâ. Urban Decay has since then removed the pictures and released an official apology stating âit in no way intended to reference self-harmâ.
Source:Twitter
Regardless of whichever side of the fence you fall regarding these controversial campaigns, both instances raise the question as to whether, as a tolerant community, we have become âover- sensitisedâ to such issues. Perhaps the endless resource of social media has in fact hindered our ability to distinguish the trivial from the true âhate crimeâ?
Nonetheless, the sad fact remains that in sales and media nothing spreads word like controversy.
The aim for many franchise giants out there like Urban Decay and ASOS is to simply generate profit, and in the dog eat dog world of retail âthere is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked aboutâ.