Her Campus Logo Her Campus Logo
Casper Libero | Culture > Entertainment

Why have Hollywood awards been prioritizing younger actresses?

Larissa Bonifácio Student Contributor, Casper Libero University
This article is written by a student writer from the Her Campus at Casper Libero chapter and does not reflect the views of Her Campus.

In recent years, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has increasingly focused on younger actresses, signaling a shift in how talent is recognized in cinema. This trend is evident in both acting categories and the selection of leading roles, being seen in other Hollywood awards as well. But what drives this choice? Are they more inclined to value the freshness and innovation of younger artists, audience expectations or something deeper? 

These questions open opinions about diversity, industry renewal, and what truly means the definition of success in contemporary cinema. Over the years, the Best Actress award, for example, has revealed much more about the Academy’s preferences and the social values of each era.

The Shifting Focus: Young Actresses in the Spotlight

In 1999, Fernanda Montenegro, at 69, was nominated for Best Actress for her role in Central do Brasil. She made history as the first Latin American actress nominated in this category. However, the winner that year was Gwyneth Paltrow, 26, for Shakespeare in Love.

Similar to 2025, where Fernanda Torres, daughter of Montenegro, was nominated for Best Actress for her role in I’m Still Here, but the award went to Mikey Madison, at just 25 years old, for her role in Anora.

Madison’s performance in Anora, a film that explores the transformation of a sex worker, epitomizes the Academy’s growing emphasis on performances that combine emotional depth with a fresh, innovative perspective. This choice highlights the industry’s increasing preference for younger actresses, driven by a shift in both audience expectations and cultural demands.

Historically, the Academy has occasionally recognized young talent, with Tatum O’Neal becoming the youngest-ever Oscar winner at age 10 for Paper Moon (1973). Similarly, Anna Paquin won Best Supporting Actress at age 11 for The Piano (1994). And Marlee Matlin remains the youngest to win Best Actress for Children of a Lesser God (1986),when she was only 21.

What Drives These Choices?

The Academy’s preference for younger actresses can be understood from several perspectives. Many young performers gain recognition for exceptional performances in high-impact films, demonstrating a level of emotional maturity that often belies their age. These performances resonate with a contemporary audience seeking new perspectives in storytelling.

Beyond individual talent, the cultural shift within the film industry has led to amplified the visibility of young actresses. In an era dominated by social media and digital platforms, these actresses appeal to younger audiences, amplifying the films they star in. The Academy may be signaling that they see these girls as the future of the industry, encouraging their continued growth and innovation.

Moreover, young actresses often take on roles that address relevant social issues, contributing to the cultural evolution of cinema. Their performances resonate with younger generations, making the films they star as a result of their contemporary world, becoming more relatable and impactful to the audience.

Consequences for the Film Industry

The rise of young actresses in major award categories has multiple consequences for the industry, both positive and challenging. On the positive side, the recognition of young talent brings diversity to stories and characters, fostering new opportunities for emerging actors and directors. This trend rejuvenates the industry which attracts younger audiences to seek films that reflect their values and realities, ultimately expanding the cultural and social impact of cinema.

However, there are challenges. The pressure on young stars to sustain success from an early age can affect their mental health, leading to possible burnout and early career stagnation – like the example that we have of Amanda Bynes, an actress too young, who suffered these consequences. Furthermore, the intensified competition in the job market can create a more aggressive environment, potentially sidelining older, more experienced actresses.

Another major challenge is Hollywood emphasizes on the physical appearance of young actresses, which often overshadows their acting abilities. This aesthetic pressure extends to older actresses with different body types, making it more difficult for them to access meaningful roles and reinforcing societal standards that prioritize youth.

Therefore, the Academy’s growing emphasis on young actresses reflects a broader cultural shift within the industry, driven by changing audience demands and a desire for innovation. While this trend opens new doors for emerging talent, it also presents challenges such as increased competition, mental health pressures, and the marginalization of older actresses. For cinema to truly evolve, it must balance the recognition of young talent with the preservation of diverse, including opportunities for all ages in the industry.

👯‍♀️ Related: K-Entertainment’s Global Takeover: A Conversation With Rakuten Viki’s Karen Paek

________

The article above was edited by Mariana De Oliver.

Liked this type of content? Check Her Campus at Casper Libero‘s home page for more!

Larissa Bonifácio

Casper Libero '28

Sou uma jornalista em formação que ama esportes no geral, e adora falar sobre entretenimento e cultura!