(TW: trauma, sexual assault)Â
âPop scienceâ books have been all the rage lately, and itâs easy to understand why. This genre of writing aims to inform the general public about scientific concepts by using language that is more accessible for those of us who are not familiar with scientific terminology. And this is great⊠when itâs done both accurately and appropriately.Â
Having recently finished Health Communism by Beatrice Adler-Bolton and Artie Vierkant (an absolutely excellent read that I will never stop talking about), I was on a bit of a nonfiction high and decided to check out a book that had been on my TBR for ages: The Body Keeps The Score by Bessel van der Kolk. I was intrigued by the bookâs premise, which sought to understand the physical and neurological effects of trauma on the brain. For months, my social media feed has been overflowing with glowing reviews of this book; many an Instagram story described it as being an âenlighteningâ read. Yet as I began reading The Body Keeps The Score, I found myself becoming increasingly concerned by the amount of praise Iâve heard this book receive. While I did find some of the psychological details in the book to be interesting, I also felt that some of the content was extremely insensitive, including the authorâs descriptions of cases involving sexual assault.Â
Case in point: the entirety of Chapter 1. After a brief prologue about his medical background, Bessel van der Kolk begins his discussion about trauma by introducing readers to one of his earlier patients named âTom,â a war veteran with severe PTSD. Bessel van der Kolk describes Tomâs experience watching his entire platoon being violently attacked by gunfire, citing this as the primary source of Tomâs trauma. He then explains that âloyalty to the dead was keeping [Tom] from living his own life,â most likely prompting many readers to sympathize with Tomâs ordeal. Unfortunately, things go downhill pretty quickly from there. After describing the events of the traumatizing attack Tom witnessed, Bessel van der Kolk writes that âmaybe even worse for Tom than the recurrent flashbacks of the ambush was the memory of what happened afterward.â He then proceeds to describe the day after the attack, when Tom took out his rage on a neighboring village by killing children, shooting an innocent farmer, and raping a Vietnamese woman.Â
But wait⊠itâs okay, because Tom felt really badly about it afterwards!Â
Not only was there zero mention of Tom being criminally charged for the literal war crimes he committed, Bessel van der Kolk actually sympathizes with Tomâs actions, writing that he âcould easily imagine how Tomâs rage about his friendâs death had led to the calamity that followed⊠Since time immemorial veterans, like Achilles in Homerâs Iliad, have responded to the death of their comrades with unspeakable acts of revenge.â Now you can call me a sensitive snowflake, but I am personally of the belief that comparing rapists to heroes in epic poetry doesnât really send a great message. Furthermore, I reject the argument that mental health issues (including trauma) excuse a person from the consequences of their actions.Â
Bessel van Kolkâs questionable narrative regarding sexual assault continued throughout the following chapters. In one case, he describes a nineteen-year-old victim-survivor of rape as being âgorgeousâ and having an âaura of mystery.â He also seems to express more sympathy for rapists (who apparently âinflicted trauma on themselvesâ by their actions) than the actual victim-survivors themselves. Frankly, the fact that these views are coming from a psychiatrist just doesnât sit well with me.Â
All in all, Iâm really disappointed by the amount of potential that was wasted on this book. Destigmatizing mental health issues and bringing attention to the lasting effects that trauma has on individuals could have been a great use of the authorâs psychological research, but his insensitive and inappropriate narration of the book ruined it for me. Back to fiction for a whileâŠ.