Her Campus Logo Her Campus Logo
mario calvo S mEIfXRzIk unsplash?width=719&height=464&fit=crop&auto=webp
mario calvo S mEIfXRzIk unsplash?width=398&height=256&fit=crop&auto=webp
/ Unsplash
Culture > News

SC Legislators Seek to Redefine Marriage

This article is written by a student writer from the Her Campus at South Carolina chapter.

Six South Carolina legislators are attempting to change the legal status of same-sex marriage in South Carolina.

The Marriage and Constitution Restoration Act,Ā if enacted into law, would define any marriage not between one man and one woman as a ā€˜parody marriageā€™ and prevent such marriages from being legally recognized by the state. The proposed bill argues that marriage between one man and one woman is secular and ā€œnatural, neutral and noncontroversial, unlike parody forms of marriageā€. Same-sex marriages are defined as religious due to sexual orientation being a ā€œmatter of faithā€. As South Carolina is prohibited by the First Amendment from favoring any one religion, the billā€™s authors claim that any legal recognition of same-sex marriage or distribution of information about same-sex marriage in public schools is unconstitutional.

The bill fails to recognize that marriage is a cultural institution, not a natural occurrence. Various cultures have different definitions of marriage and different practices associated with it, so to allege that heterosexual and monogamous marriage is the natural default is incorrect. Same-sex married couples can be found in any religion or culture, so to define same-sex marriage as a separate religion is also wrong.

The authors go beyond attacking same-sex marriages to discrediting all non-heterosexual identities. Sexual orientation is explicitly defined as ā€œa self-asserted sex-based identityā€ based on ā€œunproven faith-based assumptionsā€. Essentially, the bill would put into law the definition of sexual orientation as a choice unsupported by science and ā€œobsceneā€. The Marriage and Constitution Restoration Act not only endangers the legal status of same-sex marriages, but the legal status of anyone who identifies as LGBT+.

Such a bill promotes misconceptions about sexual orientation and would lead to further discrimination against the LGBT+ community. The bill authors argue that South Carolina recognizing same-sex marriage has led to increased persecution of non-observers. These six legislators clearly donā€™t understand what persecution is. Persecution is 30% of openly LGBT peopleĀ experiencing discrimination in the workplace. Persecution is 61% of LGBT+ studentsĀ who have been victimized at school not reporting the incident to school staff out of fear. Persecution is being deemed a parody of normal people.

The representatives sponsoring the bill are Steven Wayne Long, William M. ā€œBillā€ Chumley,Ā James Mikell ā€œMikeā€ Burns, John R. McCravy, III, Josiah Magnuson andĀ  Richard ā€œRickā€ Martin.

To take action, find and contact your representative at the South Carolina State Houseā€™s website.

Bri Hamlin

South Carolina '19

Hello, it's Bri (to the tune of Adele please). I am a senior at USC Columbia and am not currently thirty, flirty, and thriving, but twenty-one, anxious, and trying will sure do.