So the Cosmo withdrawal kicked in again, leaving me perusing the bookstore racks to get my June fix. I can honestly say I was more impressed with the general content of this issue, but letâs face it â it is Cosmo and therefore there was some ridiculousness that needs to be addressed.
Â
Letâs start with the cover.Â
Sorry Maurie and Eve, but that leopard print so-called dress on Cameron Diaz resembles something Iâd find in a sorority rally box rather than on the cover of a lifestyle magazine. And perhaps thatâs what they were going for, so this one is on Cosmo. For someone who features extensive fashion spreads in their magazine, I would suggest you choose a more suitable cover outfit if you want to seem at all credible in the style department. Cosmo: -1
Â
The Weird Trait Guys Look For in a Date
Apparently, we should flaunt our parenting skills to potential suitors because thatâs the ânumber one quality dudes seek in a new girlfriend.â Cosmo fails to acknowledge that the survey cited reveals that an equal number of men value a caring and compassionate partner or that a larger percentage of women consider good parenting skills a very important trait in a potential partner.[1] However, I must acknowledge that this article, in fact, does effectively apply factual anthropological concepts to a real world scenario in a newfound manner. Cosmo: +1.
Â
The Craving Guys Have at 9 p.m.
Awaiting an earth-shattering conclusion about a universal craving that men have at 9 p.m., I was left questioning the logic of the writers. Rather than discussing a phenomenon plaguing all men, this article specifically references men who eat simple sugar, alcohol and simple carbohydrates around 7 p.m. Thanks for that nutrition lesson: junk food equals crashing, which apparently demands affection. So essentially, these times are arbitrary and not to mention useless when dealing with a healthy guy. Cosmo: -1
Â
Ask Him Anything
Itâs an advice column written by a guy a.k.a. no female editors with ludicrous, off-base recommendations. How off could he be? You just wait.  The reader laments about her boyfriend who always goes down on her, but she just doesnât get off that way. Hereâs where âguy guru,â Ky Henderson comes in to save the day â I mean figure out how she can let him know there are other things sheâd rather do. It started off strong: he insightfully mentioned that revealing, âIâve never gotten off that way,â would effectively translate, âMy exes never got me off that way.â But next he offers some inexplicably bad advice: âYou could say something like, âImagine me sucking your toes. No matter how amazing my technique was, it wouldnât get you off because itâs not your thing.ââ And you thought comparing him to the exes was bad? Nope, in fact, your down-there skills are equivalent to sucking my toes. Ouch, thatâs rough.  Cosmo: -1
Â
Dirty Talk That Drives Men Wild
Cosmo says: âThat orgasm was so intense, my eyes rolled so far back into my head that I could see my insides!â
Allison says: I appreciate the enthusiasm, but seriously?
Â
Cosmo says: âShe straddled me, beat her chest and made the Tarzan call.â
Allison says: Maybe this has something to do with the anthropological explanation of dating behavior detailed aboveâŠthatâs about the only acceptable explanation for that one.
This article is written by a student writer from the Her Campus at Stanford chapter.