Netflix has long been a goliath in entertainment, with projects encompassing every subsection of the film industry from teen fiction to academy award winning thrillers (think the Irishman and Marriage Story). The companyâs success expanded to their documentary series; out of Netflixâs 8 total Oscar wins, 5 have been awarded for projects in the âBest Documentary Short Subjectâ category. This begs the question, why would Netflix stray away from this format in recent production, turning instead to drama series based on dramatizing already traumatic events?
Why would Netflix pivot from the retelling of truth to the recollection of rumour?
The recent release of Blonde is a testimony to Netflixâs pivot. The film â directed by Andrew Dominik â tells the story of Marilyn Monroe and is labelled as a biopic. This suggests a story much like an autobiography, that focuses on real events within Monroeâs overtly famous life in both a respectful and fastidious manner; a testament that cannot succeed in this film. The plot is based on a work of fiction with the same name written by Carol Oates, which includes many moments that were nothing more than rumours, chiefly Marilynâs affair with President Kennedy. Andrew Dominik cheapens this ideal even further in his directing choices, choosing to focus a large portion of the film on Monroeâs unwilling sexualisation and sexual assault, whilst simultaneously throwing in nude scenes only meant to over sexualise an already fetishized character. Beyond this, the supposed biopic tastelessly recreates the starâs death in the exact spot of actual Monroeâs death, while simultaneously preaching the mediaâs unfair treatment of this celebrity. The product is nothing more than a disingenuous fiction labelled as fact, which once again thrusts Marilynâs image into the spotlight that plagued her life and made her a commodity of Hugh Hefnerâs playboy, as well as the film industry.
Another example of this disingenuous monopoly of trauma is present in the new short series based on Jeffery Dahmer. The release of Dahmer was received with a great deal of praise, especially for Evan Peters, who has been reviewed to give one of the most realistic performances of a serial killer to date. While the series did well to avoid falling into the same glorification trap seen in previous stories (like Ted Bundyâs motion picture Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile), it instead fell into a very different trap. The drama once again focuses on a retelling of rumour instead of the full truth most expect from a show entirely based on real tragedies.
More importantly, the show failed to receive the consent from the victimsâ families before release. The cousin of one of Dahmerâs victims (Errol Lindsey) named Eric Toulu spoke out on twitter against the series, stating that his family were âpissedâ and that scenes recreated for the show were âretraumatising [the family] over and over againâ, referring to the constant recycling of Dahmerâs crimes for the sake of entertainment. Toulu goes further to state that ârecreating my cousin having an emotional breakdown in court in the face of the man who tortured and murdered her brother is wild.â This is in reference to a scene in the series based on real trial tapes, in which Rita Isbell confronts Dahmer for the murder of her brother.
“Recreating my cousin having an emotional breakdown in court in the face of the man who tortured and murdered her brother is wild”
– Eric Toulu
Netflix failed to inform the victimâs families about the short series before it was released to the public, much like they failed to listen to Monroeâs wishes as they once again used her as a commodity for the entertainment industry. These actions shatter any sincerity in the director’s and companyâs claims of good intentions â itâs impossible for a series to critique an industry they are a part of successfully. It is shallow for Netflix to claim that Dahmer was in support of the victims’ families who were failed by society, whilst they simultaneously recreate distressing scenes without permission. Once again, Netflix perpetuates half-truths at the cost of the victims, aiming to create entertainment from trauma and the morbid curiosity of fans. By monetising these rumours, it darkens the memory of these events, manipulating the legacies of the dead. Their popularity on Netflix only perpetuates this new business plan, so after the success of Dahmer and Blonde the only real question is whose trauma will be monetised next?